Comments - Hekato

To clarify, there is a difference. Altruists and egoists both have the capacity for "good and evil".

For an example, the "Greater Good" that altruists strive for is entirely subjective/situational. The altruist may even act in a utilitarian manner, which may not conform to the traditional good morality defined by the D&D system.

Think knights eliminating a whole village on the notion that the village has been tainted (infection, curses, what have you).

In this way the knights would be acting as altruists following their definition of the "Greater Good'. They are stopping a threat to others. However, they are also forgoing respect for life, and the dignity of the sapient. Therefore, not conforming to what is "good".

The game isn't finished.

It's written sort of awkwardly BECAUSE it is grammatically correct.

In this case, it was written in the past-tense but should be (most headlines are written this way) in the present tense, as in:

ALIEN OBJECTS APPEARING ALL OVER THE WORLD

WASHINGTON- Several thousand demonstrators rallied around the objects as president considers calling a "state of emergency"

This makes sense, (I guess) since it seems to flow better and calls for a sense of urgency being in the present tense and all.

Just my two cents (or nickels; Canada doesn't have pennies anymore).

Co-op? Procedurally generated adventures? Oh snap.