Comments - BossGeneral

Have been playing this mod and I question multiple decisions in the mod and would like to know the reasoning behind them. This is just a quick and simple list from what I observed so far (will play more and add to it). I'd also like to add that while I enjoyed playing the modification so far I'd still like to ask about the below.

Su-47 (Why? It's a technology demonstrator)
Battlemaster should be modeled after the Type 96A/B and not the Type 59 (it's not even the Type-59D)
No Tu-95MS6/16 as a strike option (what's the point of having Tu-22MS3 buildable and then having it as a separate option
Why is Russia's superweapon the EMP Missile strike. Would be more accurate to have it as RS-24/RS-28 strike.
J-10 should be modeled after the J-10B/C
Z-10 is modeled after the prototype (see here: Tapatalk.com)
Su-35 texture isn't modeled after production Su-35S
Su-30M2?
Su-27SM?
Mig-29SMT?
Type-99 is A or G?
Marauder tank should be a T-72M series
GLA Destroyer should be a 2S1/2S3 SPG
PLA SPG should be the PLZ-05
PLA AA-SPG should be the PGZ-09
Why the DF-21 instead of the DF-15/16?
GLA suicide plane may be better suited with an An-2
OTR-21 Tochka instead of SCUD launcher for GLA?
HQ-9 should have an upgrade option to HQ-19 (S-400)
Possibility of Mi-28N?
Possibility of Shenyang FC-31/J-31?
Helix should be called by the respective Z-9 version (Z-9A/B?)
Pantsir missing?

I'm updating this list as well and editing accordingly with TEOD-94. I'll keep adding to it but so far that's what I have.

Perhaps release the mod as-is then. There is no point in it being buried or hidden.

I'm sure the GLA could get their hands on a BAZ-6909 chassis so perhaps the MAZ chassis here is a bit redundant ?

Very interesting combination of an Iskander BAZ chassis and an Elbrus MAZ chassis. Call it a Frankenstein between BAZ and MAZ.

Release it as then so the community can at least work on it...

Or at least release a beta.

That's the prototype that is depicted. Here is the differences between prototype and serial production version:

Alert5.com

(Top - Serial)
(Bottom - Prototype)

Nevertheless good effort and work.

Wrong color scheme and decals:

http://airpigz.com/storage/hi-res/2012/F-35A_AF-08_In-Flight.jpg

Nevertheless good effort and work.

Russia does not use camouflage for their military. Camouflage is used by parade and demonstration units. Don't believe me well look at these service BTR-82A's:

Img.defencetalk.com

How Stereotypical and you posted this ?

Iraq also captured the Koksan. How about an Iraqi variant ?

Will we see a PLZ-05 ?

Will the DF-31A or the DF-41 be included seeing as how Russia has the Topol-M ?

That doesn't explain or answer why there is a Czech roundel on the side of the Tunguska. The Czech republic never used it and they don't operate it.

Hobbymastercollector.com

Era blocks found on export Syrian T-72's look like this:

Ipmsstockholm.org

Missing the Egyptian roundels on the F16 wing's. Otherwise looks good.

Why is there a Czech roundel on the side of the Tunguska. Doesn't make any sense.

Also Russia uses the 2S6M primarily with some 2S6M1 in service.

Aiming for the S-300PMU1 or the PMU2 with this version ?

Were you basing it off the Xia Class or the Type 094 ?

Thanks.

Whats the difference between using the Installer and the seperate folders that also come in the .zip such as data and what is the proper procedure to installing 2.0 then patch 2.0.1 ?

This is for Retail not Steam version.

China and Russia have developed all kinds of countermeasures and anti-access technologies against NATO/US and their Achilles heel.

The US primarily depends on its carrier battle groups to enforce and maintain sea-lanes but China's counter to it is the DF-21D ASBM.

America also relies heavily upon its satellite for intelligence gathering and situation awareness. China and Russia have proven to counter it through the use and deployment of ASAT technologies such as the SC-19 (refer to Chinese 2010/2007 tests).

The reality is that America is a weakening and declining power and China and Russia are rising powers. The trend in history has shown that Rising and declining powers come into conflict (ex Germany-UK 1914) and China and Russia are being transformed into heavily ultranationalised and militarized countries similar to the Japanese of 1930's.

That's where Americas achilees heel lies in is air superiority and technology. Their over-reliance on technology and air superiority will be their bane.

The problem is that Russia and China have learned to overcome Americas strengths a long time ago and have developed the perfect countermeasures. That's not even talking about the dense and highly advanced air defense networks both Russia and China have.

No they don't. The new roundel was adopted in early 2010 and aircraft have had their roundel repainted/redone since then to comply with the request.

Downvoting that comment is just useless because facts/truth always trumps rash decisions.

China doesn't use the PLZ45. They only had 1 training battalion with the PLZ93 and it never entered service unlike the PLZ05.

Are we going to see the HQ-9B/HQ-16/HQ-19 ?

Your missing either the APC/IFV turret on the WZ-551.

Skirts are rubberized just like many modern Russian MBT's have skirts with rubber overlaid on top.

Cencio4.files.wordpress.com

Holloman airforce base.

Looks cliche and stereotypical.