The Old God has left the world and the pretenders are awakening and coming out from hiding. You start the game by designing one of the pretender gods that will compete for true ascension to godhood. The type of god can range from a magically powerful arch mage to an ancient kraken or a mystic monolith that people pray to. Your pretender controls one of over sixty different nations and with the help of that nation he will spread his word and battle the other pretenders. Dominions 3 is a turn based strategy game. You can play single- or multiplayer (1 - 23 players) with simultaneous turns. There are more than 1500 different units, 600 spells and 300 magic items in the game. The game also features a medieval musical score by Erik Ask Uppmark and Anna Rynefors, both awarded the title of Musicians of the Realm by the Swedish Zornmärkeskommiten. Dominions 3 is a highly detailed game and a 300 page pdf manual is included in the download.
Posts | ||
---|---|---|
Banned: crazyike | Locked | |
Thread Options | ||
May 12 2013 Anchor | ||
Due to his behavior in the April Showers game thread, specifically this post and the abusive PMs sent to Calahan, forum moderator and administrator of that game, and after being duly warned of the consequences of continued abusive behavior, crazyike has been banned from the Dominions 3 forum. In case any of you are wondering whether the decision to ban him was excessive, following is the text of the PM he sent to Calahan (sections quoted from Calahan in blue). I have said that I will not tolerate this kind of behavior in these forums and crazyike can serve as the example to show that I mean it. He has also already accused the moderators of abuse of power without any basis in fact, so there is no reason not to ban him since his behavior demonstrates that he will do so every time things are not done according to his wishes.
|
||
|
May 12 2013 Anchor | |
Thank you very much Edi. We don't need that type here. The discussion of who's rules count has appeared before with this forum. I think it's very prudent to say that rules from other places don't matter. The rules that count are the rules of this forum. Those rules are set by Desura, Illwinter and then the moderators of this forum in that order. I don't see why that is hard to comprehend. In this case, crazyike clearly broke the rules of the forum and insulted a forum moderator. IMO, fighting with a moderator is a banning offence. Moderation is a volunteer job and no one should have to take abuse for it. Er, this may sound a bit hypocritical for those with long Dominions 3 history. But I have learned a few things since then. I would like to credit Tom Chick of the Quarter to Three forums with his decision to remove players that are a problem for him on a forum he owns. That clarified some very important things for me. When you own a forum it is your house. You can tell anyone to leave for any reason you want. It's your house. Edited by: Maerlande |
||
May 12 2013 Anchor | ||
These do get interesting as the forum begins to take its shape. |
||
May 13 2013 Anchor | ||
Just like Josef Stalin, Castro and other ex revolutionaries, power and responsibility has brought you to your proper senses -- Voice of ***** and her spicy crew! |
||
May 13 2013 Anchor | ||
Internet drama at its best. And some "mad skillz" here demonstrated by someone who used to organize Diplomacy games since before I was even born. Tbh, I am/was known as quite the troublemaker myself... and are usually the first to post some snarky remarks regarding bans. Yet in this case, and with the risk of unwillingly kissing some arses. |
||
|
May 13 2013 Anchor | |
Jun 6 2013 Anchor | ||
I personally wouldn't ban someone for that. Seems like there are better ways of dealing with the situation. Crazyike you're welcome at the dom3mods forum, which has different rules but an awful admin and the worst mods. |
||
Jun 6 2013 Anchor | ||
It's seems from the numerous examples crazyike gives from his own life, that he has deep issues with power, authority figures, acceptance and understanding. Hopefully, he took the banning as an opportunity to resolve those issues, thereby transmuting this seemingly negative event for him into a blessing in disguise. |
||
Jun 7 2013 Anchor | ||
Ive seen that happen many times. Something happens to get a moderator or staff to chat a member. They are asked to comply. The member tends to get punished more on the response than on the original offense. Followed by lots of posts about how unfair it was for a major punishment on the original minor offense. In almost any case a simple "Im sorry" is all that was required. Acknowledgement of "your forum, your rules, I will comply". Ive admined worlds, moderated forums, op'd channels, and root-admined servers. I have always said that in almost every case when a member was removed it was voluntary. As far as I am concerned if someone is asked to comply but give a response like "Eff you. Nuke me!" then they have volunteered to leave. |
||
Jun 7 2013 Anchor | ||
The problem here was that crazyike flew right off the handle when things did not go his way. He tried to push again after that and when it didn't get him the result he wanted, he sent the extremely abusive PM that violates every possible variation of the fairly lenient rules of conduct we have here. Even that did not get him banned, but only warned to calm down, step back and leave it alone. He refused and then threw in (not for the first time) an accusation of moderatorial and administrative abuse of power without any basis whatsoever in fact. That sort of behavior is typically used in an attempt to discourage enforcement of rules by moderators by casting them as jackbooted oppressors. It is usually done in the mistaken belief that the threat of accusation will get the accuser more lenient treatment and leeway to continue the behavior that drew scrutiny in the first place. It is basically a fancy, passive-aggressive way of saying "I'm not going to play by the rules even though you ask. So what are you going to do, ban me?" My answer to such accusations and that implicit question is "Yes, I am. Goodbye!" every time. I've seen it several times in the past in other forums and if someone is already making good on the threats that he is ostensibly only considering using unless he gets his way, I and the community in general lose nothing by dealing with the issue immediately instead of letting it fester. I've seen similar situations go down in other places where even after tricks like this, a troll has been given second chances and the only thing it ever did was emboldened them and ultimately came to the same end result, only after a lot more useless drama in between. This has the added benefit that if the first graphic example doesn't leave a lasting enough impression to discourage future behavior by other troublemakers, then subsequent similarly graphic examples will. It should be noted that since the purpose of this community is to provide a venue for discussing Dominions 3, sharing information and organizing multiplayer games, I do NOT want to ban anyone. That doesn't mean that I will refrain from decisively swinging the Ban Hammer if it becomes necessary. The decisions are also going to be public, just like this one has been, precisely to provide a necessary measure of transparency and accountability to the process. When the community can see the decision making process and judge it themselves, it prevents an atmosphere of poisonous distrust from forming. It also provides a review mechanism for decisions, because if it ever happens that someone is unjustly banned, the community can publicly protest that decision and lay down the reasons why it's wrong. So if I ever do happen to go off the deep end and turn into a power mongering maniac, I can be called to account. And if that happens, what am I going to do? Ban everyone who disagrees with me? There wouldn't be a community left and even before it got to that point I'd be removed by others with the power to do so. I am amenable to the possibility of parole and rescinding a ban if there are good reasons for doing so. But I will have to be convinced first. In this particular case the arguments so far are not persuasive. Not at this time and not so soon after it. And in case of rescinding a ban and essentially giving a second chance, the person receiving such a reprieve would be expected to behave in an exemplary fashion. If anyone ever needs to be banned twice, the only thing that could reverse it is a Proclamation of Illwinter. So, all of the above has basically not been stated outright in the rules of conduct thread, but perhaps some of it will be moved there. In any case, it is now here for everyone to see, so that there is no confusion about what policies apply when dealing with egregious violations, especially violations of the kind that led to this thread. |
||
Jun 7 2013 Anchor | ||
Of course then you get the "you know that you cant REALLY keep me out" They get a new IP, and a new login, and sneak back in trying very hard not to seem to be the same person. |
||
Jun 8 2013 Anchor | ||
I think it deserves to be said that I am VASTLY more in favor of this banning system than the "system" that was used at Shrapnel, even though the rules are generally pretty similar. |
||
Jun 10 2013 Anchor | ||
Knowing why someone was banned is definitely helpful to users of the forum. |
||
Jun 13 2013 Anchor | ||
I can't help feel a certain sense of irony when he claims that Calahan types very long winded posts belittling people. Pot meet kettle. |
||
|
Jun 13 2013 Anchor | |
I agree with those sentiments. It`s much easier to write a post when you have a clear understanding of the policies and consequences. Kudos to Edi for making this clear. |
||
Oct 2 2013 Anchor | ||
World is full of various people. |
||
Oct 12 2013 Anchor | ||
Knowing why someone is banned is helpful, altho printing a private message to do it is an interesting choice. |
||
|
Oct 13 2013 Anchor | |
Being rude to the staff should be quite sufficient. They are volunteers and don't need that shit. It's quite enough for me at least. Arguing with staff over issues shouldn't be ban worthy unless someone gets obnoxious. And well, this guy was really obnoxious. There are other places you can be a jerk. The official forums shouldn't be one of them. |
Only registered members can share their thoughts. So come on! Join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) and join in the conversation.