Yuribeard7
The joined
WARNING! Beware of Steve. Frequently breaks out in smart-ass with a high concentration of sarcasm when exposed to the following: propaganda, uninteresting details, falsified information, lying, ignorance, stupidity, pig-headedness/stubbornness, and false doctrine. Seek immediate medical and psychiatric treatment if exposed to the facts and corrections he makes. If burn marks should appear accompanied by frustration and inability to comprehend, immediately seek out the nearest Bible and read it, starting at the beginning. Secondary exposure could lead to new permanent Biblical knowledge and understanding. This is your final and only warning.
Zion Warrior
(view original)
Post a comment
one word: AWESOME!!!!!!
looks abit like elf armor but still kicks ***
and right when I actually believed it wouldn't get any more ridiculous you go and prove me wrong again....
(buried)
Looks like someone is so full of irrational hate that he hates any art that depicts Israel and it's supporters too.
Where did I say hate? The artist is obviously talented. i don't hate Israel or it's "supporters". I disagree with them. The difference is that were I pointing a gun at their heads I wouldn't pull the trigger. The message portrayed by this "Israeli crusader" is however, quite the opposite. That is, a man of peace would not need to wear battle armor.
Firstly, its just art. Secondly, its symbolic.
Not "Firstly". Just "first". Art is never "just art" it has an intended message and an intended audience.
I believe I implied that in my second point when I said it was symbolic.
Yes, and I said it implied the symbolism was pointing towards violent action and flag waving. I'm gad we've established that.
Did you read the Jewish Bible?
I own a Complete Jewish Bible. Very difficult to read and understand having been raised reading from a purely "Christian" perspective that was heavily tainted. I have a hard time with the names of people having been used to their English names instead of their Hebrew ones.
Lol, i know you read, i mean Pays.
Now modber, you know that based on conversations with me in the past, I am an atheist, which means the likely (and true) answer to your question is no. I can promise you, that even if I did, I would not think any differently than I do now, and nothing either of us say here and now will change the other's mind.
Or maybe Yuri just happens to like the picture? I mean I posted a Crusader image on my profile ages back but I hardly meant it to mean "death to all unbelievers" I like medieval armor and knights especially crusaders so perhaps you're looking for meaning where there is none.
Only a fool leaves himself open and vulnerable, especially during a time of "peace".
Jesus (even if I think he's fictional). Thoreau. Gandhi. MLK. Are these people "fools"?
Plenty of fools wear armor.
As a matter of fact, I think your statement goes the other way around, Yuri.
*sigh* I'm talking on a national level. Anyway since you mention it. Yeshua (Jesus) was not open and vulnerable. He CHOSE to allow what happened. He could have simply waved His hand and caused His enemies to cease to exist if He wanted to since He was/is God afterall. As for these other people you listed, yeah they were foolish for leaving themselves open to assassination when it could have been avoided. However, they were essentially martyred which drove home their points and made them possible.
So a human life is worth less on a national level? Killing never has and never will solve anything.
Funny, he's very ugly.
...why judge someone's worth based on their looks?
Granted, it is a drawing...
Warriors are supposed to be pretty I suppose?
Go back to romancing Anders in Dragon Age 2.