Great work! But why did you call the tanks in the pictures "T-72" in the title but "Asad Babil" on the writing in the image? They do look like the Asad Babils.
Actually, they are different. Iraq had very few T-72s, and even then they were export versions. The "Saddam" was the next step down, Iraqi assembled T-72s with even worse specifications, and then there are the Asad Babils, which aren't even close to being "tanks" ymore, just mobile pillboxes.
I would type in Arabic, but I'm a little rusty.
Na They are good tanks they do their job well as being Tank.
There is a difference b/w Tank and Tank destroyer the cannon has everything to do with this.
As you are calling this a failure because of Gulf war? Well US destroyed Iraqi Army through Airforce 90% of Armor was destroyed by most advanced Jets and they say Iraqi dont know how to fight. how can an Army defend itself without Air support it is just a sitting Duck then.
Great work! But why did you call the tanks in the pictures "T-72" in the title but "Asad Babil" on the writing in the image? They do look like the Asad Babils.
thank u :)
and t-72 in iraqi called as asad babils
Actually, they are different. Iraq had very few T-72s, and even then they were export versions. The "Saddam" was the next step down, Iraqi assembled T-72s with even worse specifications, and then there are the Asad Babils, which aren't even close to being "tanks" ymore, just mobile pillboxes.
I would type in Arabic, but I'm a little rusty.
i don't know :P.
anyway it's still same model
and you don't have to type in arabic
thanks for details
Na They are good tanks they do their job well as being Tank.
There is a difference b/w Tank and Tank destroyer the cannon has everything to do with this.
As you are calling this a failure because of Gulf war? Well US destroyed Iraqi Army through Airforce 90% of Armor was destroyed by most advanced Jets and they say Iraqi dont know how to fight. how can an Army defend itself without Air support it is just a sitting Duck then.