Comments - p*a*t*t*o*n

Those are too big to fit through the Stargate, however I believe a Bradley or a BTR will fit through.

Also shameless plug: Moddb.com

That's no post...that's a double post

To be honest no one ever used them because in vanilla if you were playing ZC you just spammed mass driver tanks and won against everything, lol.

As Boda said they were in fact the same tank, although I believe T95 was the final designation. It was an utterly massive but slow tank designed to breach the Siegfried Line but ended up cancelled because the allies broke through too quickly.
Kind of an ironic testament to the fact that this thing was as slow as sin :P

Way cool, reminds me of the T95 from the Secret Weapons pack for Battlefield 1942 :)

...calm down, jennifer

Well, when you try to take over the world....

That looks fantastic, real enough to be believable with enough of that command and conquer feel left to fit in with the rest

Awesome! It's like the BA love child of a Mammoth Tank and an AT-AT

I get the very distinct impression that the poor Sage Engine just isn't advanced enough to do what you want it to do. The mod looks amazing, but some things like the boats and the way the planes move just looks a little wonky. Not your fault, just the engine showing its age.

Oh my mod is finished, lol. Ran out of time to work on it and just lost the drive :)
If you want to compare notes I'd be happy to give any help I can though.

Possibly. I only really brought it up for your benefit and anyone else in the thread (that means you karma klowns) who did not know the whole story. I am confident with the information I have on the subject, and have no desire to seek out a long-winded debate. I have a limited amount of free time to spend, and arguing with people on the internet is always a waste of time. All the same I might pop in later on if I have time.

Yes! I'm glad other people are bothered by the damage models as well! I tried to balance it out with my mod but somehow I think you're going to do a much better job than I did ;)
Good luck to you sir!

You need to not believe the drivel that spills out of Carlo Kopp's mouth. That man has a very specific agenda against stealth aircraft in general and the F35 in particular, and has been debunked on numerous occasions by people that know what they are talking about and whose opinions I trust.
I can only tell you that you do not, in fact, know as much about the subject as you think you do. A report on a few tests of dubious accuracy created by a man who would see the F-111 restored as the principle Australian strike aircraft does not an argument make, sir. Especially when decades of studies, tests, and analysis say otherwise.
As for why passive Doppler and other VLF systems are not a hard counter to stealth and what the direction of the Russian (and Chinese) aviation programmes is, I do not have the time to go into it right now. If you really want to talk more feel free to PM me and we can get more into it without cluttering up the chat. I am usually pretty busy but I'm happy to chat if you don't mind waiting several hours for a reply :)

Allow me to chime in in the 'over-analyzing' game...
In the Real World, the Su-35 is not a match for the Raptor. The -47 is not particularly stealthy, nor was it designed as such. It was designed as a super-maneuverable, front-swept wing testbed. In combat, stealth>>>maneuverability.
Ergo, the (real)Raptor eats the (real)-47's lunch.

Now as you said, this is a game where things are different. In order to suspend disbelief, either A) the devs are going to add stealth to the Raptor therefore making an air war victory more plausible, B) assume the Raptors in the story have stealth but has been removed for balance purposes, or C) a deus ex which will explain everything that has yet to be revealed :)

My $0.02

Bottom-left one is the only one which looks like its capable of flight IRL, therefore it should not be the one selected :D
As for a name I agree with Heron

Less stealthy, more badass

1 - game =\= realistic
2 - preset hardpoints are also in battlefield
3 - this is extremely impressive for a 3rd party game. its not going to stop me from buying bf4 when it comes out, but its still impressive. its like a blend of bf2 and cs

wow, that is definitely one cool looking ship. Farseer, you said it was inspired by the Nighthawk, but to me it looks closer to the fictional F-19:
Toyking.com.tw
In any case, good stuff and glad to see you're still at it o7

they cause all kinds of issues with keeping the a/c stealthy unfortunately...

kind of; certain missiles such as the aim 54 have a secondary home-on-jam feature designed to take out EAW aircraft

will missiles with a "home-on jam" feature be able to target jamming a/c?

shish-kebab

It was pretty much the British AK47, just 50 years earlier and more sexy-er.

Some of their units definitely have a "Yuri" feel to them IMO

I'm sorry my semantics bothered you so much -.-
Seriously I'm fairly confident the average person is intelligent enough to tell from the context of the conversation what I meant. Especially since racist is much shorter to write than "Germanophobe"

I think that's a slightly racist way of looking at the Germans, on par with the cheese-eating surrender monkeys for the French. Just because it happened once, even twice, doesn't mean that they will always behave that way.

Better a German Europe than a Russian one.
Also Germans=/=Nazis. As someone with a German heritage it gets really old after a while when people forget that.

My recommendation was a very generic and base suggestion with game balance in mind over realism. The Chally has Dorchester which at the moment is pretty much the gold standard in composite armour right now, the Leo's is less advanced than the Dorchester or the DU Chobham that the Abrams uses but still comparable, neither the French or Israeli armours are really well-documented although the Israeli armour has been battle-tested, while the LeCercs has not

In order possibly to head off the massive ******* contest following here, I offer this statement:
Pretty much every modern Western MBT (Leclerc, Chally 2, Leo 2, M1A2, Merkava 4) is fully capable of killing any other tank on that list. There is no "best" tank per se, the margin of difference between these tanks is so minor that it's all about the tactics you use and what support you can bring to the table rather than the actual tanks themselves.

On topic, I think the idea of a random technical-style MBT for the EU faction is a great and unique idea that well-represents the variety a multi-national and diverse faction such as Europe brings to the table. If I may make a suggestion as to a slight variety between the three tanks: LeClerc-speed, Chally-armour, Leo2-firepower.
Thank You and Good Night :D