• Register
Report poll Would you allow licensing of your own custom-built engine?

Poll started by feillyne with 315 votes and 4 comments. Browse the poll archive.

 34%

Yes, gladly (107 votes)

 7%

Nope, my engine only for my games (23 votes)

 8%

No, but my games will be moddable (26 votes)

 12%

Can't, already using a closed-source proprietary/commercial engine (38 votes)

 5%

Can't, using a closed-source proprietary/commercial engine, my games will be moddable though (16 votes)

 8%

My game is open-source (25 votes)

 25%

I'm not a developer (80 votes)

Post comment Comments
Olofson
Olofson Oct 17 2011, 7:43am says:

"Nope" - although older versions of EEL, EELBox and ZeeSpace are already available under the LGPL, and the newer ones, and ChipSound (the new sound engine) probably will be eventually.

The reason why I'm not keen on licensing any of this commercially is that I'm already spending too much time on engine development and too little time on game development. I don't want to add support and feature requests to that.

That said, I might reconsider if it turns out my tech could generate substantially more revenue than my games.

+3 votes     reply to comment
JibbSmart
JibbSmart Oct 18 2011, 11:29pm says:

Perhaps should've included the option "No, documenting and making it reasonably user friendly would be too much work." That probably would've ended up being my answer if I was using my own engine, but I had to go with "Can't... commercial engine".

+3 votes     reply to comment
xhunterko
xhunterko Oct 19 2011, 2:55pm says:

But yeah. I said yes first. Unless it's a commercial game. And even with a commercial game, I'd gut out the graphics and all and just give a basic engine anyways. Because, someone's going to clone it anyways right?

+2 votes     reply to comment
Sph!nx
Sph!nx Oct 20 2011, 10:09am says:

Well, I develop our engine and tools purely for our own needs. Everything will be specific for our own projects, so I cannot see others being interested in using it. Being moddable is definitely an option because our programs 'infrastructure' is build with that in mind.

If I would try to make it broader and more interesting for other developers, I would have to compete with many other great engines and SDK's and I see myself a game developer and not an SDK developer.

+2 votes     reply to comment
Post a Comment
click to sign in

You are not logged in, your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) which we encourage all contributors to do.

2000 characters limit; HTML formatting and smileys are not supported - text only

Poll
Browse
Polls
Add Poll
Members only
Report Abuse
Report poll
Share